it is clear that the more social, economic, and political progress br is made and the more educated the Arabs become, the less satis- br fied they will be and the more extreme, nationalistic, and an- br tagonistic to the Jewish state. The question of higher living standards, more integration br and opportunities, and greater education are not the ultimate br issues for the Arabs. The-Jewish-Arab conflict in Israel is not a br social or economic or political one. It is much deeper than that; br it has to do with the very definition and basis of the state. As br long as Israel persists in defining itself de jure, officially as the br Jewish state, as long as it adheres to the Zionist and Judaistic br credo of the land as belonging to the Jewish people, there will be br hatred, conflict, blood, war. But the leaders of Israel do not have the courage to say this. br They persist in their ultimately catastrophic delusion that the br solution to the Arab problem in Israel is greater progress toward br social and economic equality, integration, and “goodwill.” And so, on June 19, 1976, the prime minister of Israel, br Yitzhak Rabin, Defense Minister Shimon Peres, former Foreign br Minister Abba Eban, a large gathering of Israeli top leadership, br and hand-picked “loyal” Israeli Arabs met for a day-long sym- br posium on the “Arab problem.” It was less than three months br after the Land Day Rebellion, and the shaken country had seen br debates, articles, government meetings, studies, speeches, sym- br posiums—all devoted to dissecting the “suddenly” angry Israeli br Arab. The question on the lips of all worried Jews was: What br makes Ahmed suddenly run wild? And, more important: How br can we stop him? Just a few years earlier, the frantic questions would not br even have been raised. A fascinating example of the almost un- br believable Israeli delusion is to be found in an article written by br Edwin Samuel in the May 1955 issue of the then prestigious br Commentary magazine. Samuel, son of Viscount Herbert Samuel, br the first British high commissioner for Palestine, wrote as an br Israeli citizen and expert on Arab affairs. What did an Israeli br expert write in those halcyon days when, like all good Arabs, the br Israeli ones were seen, here and there, but seldom heard? “With an overwhelming Jewish majority, it is extremely br doubtful whether a separate Arab culture can be maintained. It br seems more than probable—even if the Arab population reaches br 60
|
||||||||||||||