|
bStiff punishments should be exacted on all employers who bhire Arab workers for less than the official or going wage. Simi- blar heavy fines and jail sentences should be meted out for hiring byoung children and for keeping workers in unhealthy and dan- bgerous working conditions. Morally such things are in- bdefensible, and from an economic standpoint they encourage the bhiring of Arabs because of the lower expense to the employer. bThese employers should be encouraged in every way to hire bJews. bAnd finally, national insurance, which among other things bsubsidizes the high Arab birthrate, must be transferred to the bJewish Agency, which as a nongovernmental organ will give bbenefits only to Jews. The process of encouraging the huge Arab bbirthrate that is designed to put an end to the Jewish state bsmacks of irrationality. bThe goal of a fair and humane transfer of Arabs from Eretz bYisrael, with full compensation and as part of an exchange of bpopulations, will be immeasurably advanced through the ending bof conditions that only encourage Israeli Arabs to remain and bcomfortably wait for their “Palestine” state to replace “Israel.” bLife must be made difficult and uncomfortable so that emigra- btion will ultimately be the better of the Arab’s choices. bThe program of Arab transfer will be the target of un- bprecedented hate and vilification from both inside and outside bIsrael. Even so, the great obstacle to its success does not lie in bthe reaction of the Gentiles, but in the anticipated fanatical ex- btremism of its Jewish opponents. bThere is a loud and influential contingent of Israeli Jews bwho would sooner see Israel come to an end as a Jewish state bthan transfer the Arabs out of the country. They will be joined bby large numbers of American Jewish liberals and the Jewish bEstablishment. These will be driven both by their gentilized, bliberal concepts and by fear of the repercussions of such a move bfor them as a minority in the Exile. bTheir presence is already noted in their shrill attack on the bJewish settlements and demands for retreat from large sections bof the liberated lands. They are essentially non-Zionists, despite btheir vigorous denials. Their basic tendencies are toward univer- bsalism, not nationalism, and their very ties to Jewishness are btempered with guilt as the contradictions between the particu- blarism and separatism of Judaism conflict with nonbarrier uni- b
|
|